D.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.G. v. State

516 So. 2d 15, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2598, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10880, 1987 WL 1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 1987·No. No. 87-69·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review which required that the juvenile and his parents make restitution to the victim of the juvenile’s aggravated battery is reversed upon a holding that (a) the trial court failed to determine that the juvenile and his parents could be reasonably expected to pay the amount of restitution ordered, § 39.11(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986); O.L. v. State, 497 So.2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); and (b) the order fails to specifically determine, as it must, the amount of restitution and the manner of payment and instead delegates this to the parties, O.L. v. State, 497 So.2d 971.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order under review which required that the juvenile and his parents make restitution to the victim of the juvenile’s aggravated battery is reversed upon a holding that (a) the trial court failed to determine that the juvenile and his parents could be reasonably expected to pay the amount of restitution ordered, § 39.11(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986); O.L. v. State, 497 So.2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); and (b) the order fails to specifically determine, as it must, the amount of restitution and the manner of payment and instead delegates this to the parties, O.L. v. State, 497 So.2d 971.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

D.G. v. State, 516 So. 2d 15, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2598, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10880, 1987 WL 1346 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

516 So. 2d 15 (D.G. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related