DG v. Department of Children and Families
This text of 903 So. 2d 1042 (DG v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
D.G., Mother of J.R., A Child, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.
Charles D. Peters, Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this dependency case, the lower court changed custody of the minor child to the child's father pursuant to section 39.521(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). At the time of the order transferring custody, however, the mother had substantially complied with her case plan, which had the sole goal of reunification of the child with the mother. Based on this fact, the court's change in custody was erroneous in the absence of a determination that reunification would be detrimental to the child. D.S. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 900 So.2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). We therefore vacate the permanent custody order and remand this cause to the lower court with instructions that it reunify, unless the court, upon sufficient factual findings, concludes that to do so would be detrimental to the child.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
SHARP, W., PLEUS, and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
903 So. 2d 1042, 2005 WL 1412091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dg-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2005.