DFS Group L.P. v. Paiea Properties
Opinion
ORDER DISMISSING “REAL PARTY IN INTEREST ALSTON HUNT FLOYD & ING’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF CONCURRING OPINION OF CHIEF JUSTICE MOON, FILED APRIL 3, 2006
Having considered “Real Party in Interest Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Concurring Opinion of Chief Justice Moon, Filed April 3, 2006,” the papers in support thereof, and the record herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for partial reconsideration of the minority position is dismissed on the ground that the relief sought is not available under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40 (permitting reconsideration of “the opinion, dispositional order or ruling” that a party asserts “the court the majority)] has overlooked or misapprehended” (emphasis added)).
STATEMENT OF NO POSITION
Inasmuch as the motion for partial reconsideration of the concurring opinion of Chief Justice Moon does not request relief from the majority opinion, we take no position on the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
133 P.3d 815 (DFS Group L.P. v. Paiea Properties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.