DFS Group L.P. v. Paiea Properties

133 P.3d 815, 110 Haw. 386, 2006 Haw. LEXIS 219
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DFS Group L.P. v. Paiea Properties. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Haw. 217
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 25662·Published

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING “REAL PARTY IN INTEREST ALSTON HUNT FLOYD & ING’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF CONCURRING OPINION OF CHIEF JUSTICE MOON, FILED APRIL 3, 2006

MOON, C.J.,

with whom LEVINSON, J., joins.

Having considered “Real Party in Interest Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Concurring Opinion of Chief Justice Moon, Filed April 3, 2006,” the papers in support thereof, and the record herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for partial reconsideration of the minority position is dismissed on the ground that the relief sought is not available under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40 (permitting reconsideration of “the opinion, dispositional order or ruling” that a party asserts “the court the majority)] has overlooked or misapprehended” (emphasis added)).

NAKAYAMA and ACOBA, JJ., and Circuit Judge POLLACK, assigned by reason of vacancy.

STATEMENT OF NO POSITION

Inasmuch as the motion for partial reconsideration of the concurring opinion of Chief Justice Moon does not request relief from the majority opinion, we take no position on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DFS Group L.P. v. Paiea Properties, 133 P.3d 815, 110 Haw. 386, 2006 Haw. LEXIS 219 (haw 2006).

133 P.3d 815 (DFS Group L.P. v. Paiea Properties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.