Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp.

D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp.

437 So. 2d 219, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23509
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 14, 1983
DocketNo. 82-2540
StatusPublished

This text of 437 So. 2d 219 (D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp., 437 So. 2d 219, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23509 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand. The trial court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice as the allegations and attached documents, taken together, were sufficient to state a cause of action. See Hinote v. Brigman, 44 Fla. 589, 33 So. 303 (1902); Delta Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Company, 262 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); and Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co., 383 So.2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

DOWNEY, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ed. L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Southern Bell Tel.
383 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hinote v. Brigman
44 Fla. 589 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1902)
Delta Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Co.
262 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 So. 2d 219, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dfs-construction-co-v-couse-corp-fladistctapp-1983.