D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp.
437 So. 2d 219, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23509
Opinion
We reverse and remand. The trial court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice as the allegations and attached documents, taken together, were sufficient to state a cause of action. See Hinote v. Brigman, 44 Fla. 589, 33 So. 303 (1902); Delta Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Company, 262 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); and Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co., 383 So.2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp., 437 So. 2d 219, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23509 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
437 So. 2d 219 (D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ed. L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Southern Bell Tel.
383 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hinote v. Brigman
44 Fla. 589 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1902)
Delta Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Co.
262 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)