D.F. v. D.M.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals

D.F. v. D.M.P.

348 S.W.3d 865, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 27, 2011

DocketNos. WD 73599, WD 73600

StatusPublished

This text of 348 S.W.3d 865 (D.F. v. D.M.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.F. v. D.M.P., 348 S.W.3d 865, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.M.P. appeals two judgments issued by the Circuit Court of Platte County, entering full orders of protection in proceedings brought by petitioners R.E.H. and D.F. pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, §§ 455.005 through 455.090, RSMo. D.M.P. contends that the judgments as to each petitioner are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.M.P. appeals two judgments issued by the Circuit Court of Platte County, entering full orders of protection in proceedings brought by petitioners R.E.H. and D.F. pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, §§ 455.005 through 455.090, RSMo. D.M.P. contends that the judgments as to each petitioner are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 S.W.3d 865, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/df-v-dmp-moctapp-2011.