D.F. v. Board of Education

180 F. App'x 232
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 9, 2006·No. No. 05-6234-cv·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff “D.F.,” through his father Andrew Finkle, appeals from a September 30, 2005 judgment of the District Court dismissing all of his claims against all defendants on the basis of the District Court’s September 12, 2005 Memorandum and Order, 386 F.Supp.2d 119 (E.D.N.Y.2005).

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

Substantially for the reasons stated in the thoughtful and comprehensive opinion of the District Court, we conclude that judgment for the defendants was appropriate for all claims.

We have carefully considered all of D.F.’s arguments and find them without merit. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.F. v. Board of Education, 180 F. App'x 232 (2d Cir. 2006).

180 F. App'x 232 (D.F. v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keenan v. Pav
E.D. New York, 2025
J.R. v. Penns Manor Area Sch. Dist.
373 F. Supp. 3d 550 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2019)
Taylor Bell v. Itawamba County School Board
774 F.3d 280 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Milo v. City of New York
59 F. Supp. 3d 513 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Bertuglia v. City of New York
839 F. Supp. 2d 703 (S.D. New York, 2012)
TC v. Valley Central School District
777 F. Supp. 2d 577 (S.D. New York, 2011)