Dezzie Brumfield D/B/A LAD Enterprises v. Jimmy Williamson, Jimmy Williamson, PC, Williamson & Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, PLLC and Law Offices of Michael Pohl

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 2020·No. 01-19-00336-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-19-00336-CV Style: Dezzie Brumfield d/b/a LAD Enterprises, et al. v. Robert Williamson, et al. Date motion filed: March 24, 2020 Type of motion: Appellants’ Partially Opposed Motion to Extend Word Limit for a Single Reply Brief Party filing motion: Appellants Document to be filed: Appellants’ reply brief

Is appeal accelerated?

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted  Denied  Dismissed  Other: _____________________________________

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Julie Countiss_______  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ____April 7, 2020______

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dezzie Brumfield D/B/A LAD Enterprises v. Jimmy Williamson, Jimmy Williamson, PC, Williamson & Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, PLLC and Law Offices of Michael Pohl, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Dezzie Brumfield D/B/A LAD Enterprises v. Jimmy Williamson, Jimmy Williamson, PC, Williamson & Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, PLLC and Law Offices of Michael Pohl (Dezzie Brumfield D/B/A LAD Enterprises v. Jimmy Williamson, Jimmy Williamson, PC, Williamson & Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, Cyndi Rusnak, PLLC and Law Offices of Michael Pohl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.