Deyoe v. Harper Brothers, Inc.

191 A. 851, 121 N.J. Eq. 599, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 557
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Egan.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12. For reversal — Donges, Cole, JJ. 2. For modification — Heher, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deyoe v. Harper Brothers, Inc., 191 A. 851, 121 N.J. Eq. 599, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 557 (N.J. 1937).

191 A. 851 (Deyoe v. Harper Brothers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Leppert
206 F.2d 83 (Third Circuit, 1953)
In re Leppert
107 F. Supp. 911 (D. New Jersey, 1952)
Sickinger v. Zimel
77 A.2d 905 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1951)
Sickinger v. Zimel
73 A.2d 281 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Jarecki v. Manville Bakery, Inc.
71 A.2d 228 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In re Incandescence, Inc.
143 F.2d 241 (Third Circuit, 1944)
Bigel v. Brandtjen Kluge, Inc.
20 A.2d 320 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Augelli
4 A.2d 495 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Atzingen v. Ottolino
2 A.2d 652 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)