Deyo v. Seagfrid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deyo v. Seagfrid

259 A.D. 953, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7413

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 953 (Deyo v. Seagfrid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deyo v. Seagfrid, 259 A.D. 953, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs adjudging that the plaintiffs were the owners of the title to the lands in Deyo Park from the physical “ bank ” to the shore line in the westerly hah of the Deyo farm; that the defendant is entitled, as an appurtenance of his lots, to the use of such land between the bank and the shore line for access to the lake in common with the other owners of lots adjoining said Deyo Park. Judgment and order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — HiE, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs adjudging that the plaintiffs were the owners of the title to the lands in Deyo Park from the physical “ bank ” to the shore line in the westerly hah of the Deyo farm; that the defendant is entitled, as an appurtenance of his lots, to the use of such land between the bank and the shore line for access to the lake in common with the other owners of lots adjoining said Deyo Park. Judgment and order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — HiE, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 953, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deyo-v-seagfrid-nyappdiv-1940.