Deyo v. . Rutland Railroad Company
139 N.E. 727, 235 N.Y. 543, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1259
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deyo v. . Rutland Railroad Company, 139 N.E. 727, 235 N.Y. 543, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1259 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 727 (Deyo v. . Rutland Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.