Deyo v. Deyo

695 N.W.2d 65, 472 Mich. 883
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 2005
Docket126795
StatusPublished

This text of 695 N.W.2d 65 (Deyo v. Deyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deyo v. Deyo, 695 N.W.2d 65, 472 Mich. 883 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

695 N.W.2d 65 (2005)

DEYO
v.
DEYO.

No. 126795.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 1, 2005.

SC: 126795. COA: 245210.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 25, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed whether the Court of Appeals erred in its finding that the defendant "contributed to the acquisition, improvement, or accumulation of the property." MCL 552.401. See Dart v. Dart, 460 Mich. 573, 597 N.W.2d 82 (1999), and Reeves v. Reeves, 226 Mich.App. 490, 575 N.W.2d 1 (1997). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dart v. Dart
597 N.W.2d 82 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1999)
Reeves v. Reeves
575 N.W.2d 1 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1998)
Dart v. Dart
460 Mich. 573 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 N.W.2d 65, 472 Mich. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deyo-v-deyo-mich-2005.