Deyo v. County Court Judge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deyo v. County Court Judge

215 A.D.2d 758, 627 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5682

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated December 21, 1994, which denied, without a hearing, the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the respondents for a new determination which, in the event the applica[759]*759tion is denied, shall include a statement of the reasons for the denial.

The respondents failed to comply with the requirement set forth in Penal Law § 400.00 (4-a) that they state in writing the specific reasons for their denial of the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated December 21, 1994, which denied, without a hearing, the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the respondents for a new determination which, in the event the applica[759]*759tion is denied, shall include a statement of the reasons for the denial.

The respondents failed to comply with the requirement set forth in Penal Law § 400.00 (4-a) that they state in writing the specific reasons for their denial of the petitioner’s application for a pistol permit. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Deyo v. County Court Judge, 215 A.D.2d 758, 627 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

215 A.D.2d 758 (Deyo v. County Court Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related