DEYLING PAULINO RODRIGUEZ v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MACIEL ESTEFANY BULI ROA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DEYLING PAULINO RODRIGUEZ v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MACIEL ESTEFANY BULI ROA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 2020

Docket19-2605

StatusPublished

This text of DEYLING PAULINO RODRIGUEZ v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MACIEL ESTEFANY BULI ROA (DEYLING PAULINO RODRIGUEZ v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MACIEL ESTEFANY BULI ROA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DEYLING PAULINO RODRIGUEZ v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MACIEL ESTEFANY BULI ROA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DEYLING PAULINO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, and MACIEL ESTEFANY BULI ROA, Appellees.

No. 4D19-2605

[January 29, 2020]

Administrative appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program; L.T. Case No. 2001325298.

Deyling Paulino Rodriguez, Coconut Creek, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee Department of Revenue.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

WARNER, FORST, JJ., and WALSH, LISA S., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI