Deyco Realty Corp. v. Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deyco Realty Corp. v. Tax Commission

31 A.D.2d 747, 297 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 747 (Deyco Realty Corp. v. Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deyco Realty Corp. v. Tax Commission, 31 A.D.2d 747, 297 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In this proceeding to review the assessed valuation of petitioner’s real property, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 4, 1967, which dismissed the petition. Order reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The findings of fact below were not considered on this appeal. It is not clear from 'the record whether the learned court below based his determination upon the value of the property on the tax status date or added subsequent improvements to that value. Accordingly, we find it necessary to remand -the proceeding for further proof and clarification (Matter of Woolworth Co. v. Tax Comm, of City of N. Y., 20 N Y 2d 561). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this proceeding to review the assessed valuation of petitioner’s real property, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 4, 1967, which dismissed the petition. Order reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The findings of fact below were not considered on this appeal. It is not clear from 'the record whether the learned court below based his determination upon the value of the property on the tax status date or added subsequent improvements to that value. Accordingly, we find it necessary to remand -the proceeding for further proof and clarification (Matter of Woolworth Co. v. Tax Comm, of City of N. Y., 20 N Y 2d 561). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 747, 297 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deyco-realty-corp-v-tax-commission-nyappdiv-1969.