DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

948 A.2d 805

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 22, 2008

Docket498 WAL 2007, 499 WAL 2007, 500 WAL 2007, 501 WAL 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 948 A.2d 805 (DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, 948 A.2d 805 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNETH E. DEYARMIN, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
G. GAY KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES G. KENNEDY, DECEASED, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
PATRICIA A. ARDIZZONE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH ARDIZZONE, SR., DECEASED, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
LINDA M. PASSONETTI, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY A. PASSONETTI, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner.

Nos. 498 WAL 2007, 499 WAL 2007, 500 WAL 2007, 501 WAL 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

April 22, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI