Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

948 A.2d 805
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 22, 2008·No. 498 WAL 2007, 499 WAL 2007, 500 WAL 2007, 501 WAL 2007·Published

Opinion

KENNETH E. DEYARMIN, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
G. GAY KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES G. KENNEDY, DECEASED, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
PATRICIA A. ARDIZZONE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH ARDIZZONE, SR., DECEASED, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
LINDA M. PASSONETTI, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY A. PASSONETTI, Respondent,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner.

Nos. 498 WAL 2007, 499 WAL 2007, 500 WAL 2007, 501 WAL 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

April 22, 2008.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, 948 A.2d 805 (Pa. 2008).

948 A.2d 805 (DEYARMIN v. Consolidated Rail Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.