Dexter v. Paugh

California Supreme Court

Dexter v. Paugh

18 Cal. 372, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 199

DecidedJuly 1, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cal. 372 (Dexter v. Paugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dexter v. Paugh, 18 Cal. 372, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 199 (Cal. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

1. The Court erred in allowing proof of injury to plaintiff’s business as a criterion of damage against the Sheriff, and the charge in connection with this ruling. (See Nightingale v. Scannell, recently decided. 2. The Court also erred in excluding the attachment papers in the case of Bosworth & Co. v. Ludekins.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

1. The Court erred in allowing proof of injury to plaintiff’s business as a criterion of damage against the Sheriff, and the charge in connection with this ruling. (See Nightingale v. Scannell, recently decided. 2. The Court also erred in excluding the attachment papers in the case of Bosworth & Co. v. Ludekins.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Cal. 372, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dexter-v-paugh-cal-1861.