Dexter v. Clark

35 Barb. 271, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 156
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 1861·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Clerke, P. J.

In Coit v. Beard, (33 Barb. 357,) the supreme court in this district expressly decided that where a judge orders that a complaint shall be dismissed, either before or after evidence is given, on both sides, a judgment entered on such a decision is no bar to a second action for the same cause. In the case before us we think it appears, both by the record introduced at the trial and by the evidence of Judge Thompson, that his decision in the action in the marine court was a dismissal of the complaint, instead of a positive judgment for the defendants, after deliberation, on the merits.

[272]*272[New York General Term, September 16, 1861.

The marine court has authority to dismiss a complaint, in the same manner and to the like effect as all courts of record could grant a nonsuit under the old system.

The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dexter v. Clark, 35 Barb. 271, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 156 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).

35 Barb. 271 (Dexter v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Donnell v. McIntyre
16 Abb. N. Cas. 84 (New York County Courts, 1885)
Shaw v. McCarty
59 How. Pr. 487 (New York Marine Court, 1880)
Gillilan v. Spratt
3 Daly 440 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)
Lockett v. Lindsay
1 Idaho 324 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1870)