Dexter v. Clark
This text of 35 Barb. 271 (Dexter v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In Coit v. Beard, (33 Barb. 357,) the supreme court in this district expressly decided that where a judge orders that a complaint shall be dismissed, either before or after evidence is given, on both sides, a judgment entered on such a decision is no bar to a second action for the same cause. In the case before us we think it appears, both by the record introduced at the trial and by the evidence of Judge Thompson, that his decision in the action in the marine court was a dismissal of the complaint, instead of a positive judgment for the defendants, after deliberation, on the merits.
The marine court has authority to dismiss a complaint, in the same manner and to the like effect as all courts of record could grant a nonsuit under the old system.
The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Barb. 271, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dexter-v-clark-nysupct-1861.