Dexter Brunson v. Carolyn W. Colvin
This text of 671 F. App'x 397 (Dexter Brunson v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dexter A. Brunson appeals following the district court’s 1 order affirming a 2012 administrative decision to deny a hearing on his third application for disability insurance benefits. Brunson has abandoned any challenge to the only ruling properly before this court by not raising it in his brief. See Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 703 F.3d 436, 438 n.3 (8th Cir. 2013) (issue is deemed abandoned where party fails to raise or discuss it in his brief); Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 87 F.3d 1025, 1026 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (dismissing pro se litigant’s appeal where brief presented no question for appellate court to decide because it identified no basis of alleged error by district court). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dexter-brunson-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2016.