Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

862 P.2d 1316, 124 Or. App. 432, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1838

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 3, 1993·No. CA A73777·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on documents not disclosed to him during a prison term hearing violates his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

We have decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on documents not disclosed to him during a prison term hearing violates his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

We have decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 862 P.2d 1316, 124 Or. App. 432, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1838 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

862 P.2d 1316 (Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related