Dewey v. Dewey

195 F.2d 779, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3026
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 1952
Docket11075
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 F.2d 779 (Dewey v. Dewey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dewey v. Dewey, 195 F.2d 779, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3026 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

Opinion

195 F.2d 779

DEWEY
v.
DEWEY.

No. 11072.

No. 11075.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 19, 1952.

Decided March 20, 1952.

Arthur J. Hilland, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

R. Duncan Clark, Washington, D. C., with whom Andrew T. Altmann and Clyde D. Garrett, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, PROCTOR, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments setting aside, on grounds of fraud and undue influence, a will and a change of beneficiary in a life insurance policy. We think there was sufficient evidence of undue influence and of fraud. We have considered appellant's other contentions but find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. Gordon
195 F.2d 779 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 F.2d 779, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dewey-v-dewey-cadc-1952.