Dewey v. Dewey

195 F.2d 779, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3026
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 20, 1952·No. 11075·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

195 F.2d 779

DEWEY
v.
DEWEY.

No. 11072.

No. 11075.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 19, 1952.

Decided March 20, 1952.

Arthur J. Hilland, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

R. Duncan Clark, Washington, D. C., with whom Andrew T. Altmann and Clyde D. Garrett, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, PROCTOR, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments setting aside, on grounds of fraud and undue influence, a will and a change of beneficiary in a life insurance policy. We think there was sufficient evidence of undue influence and of fraud. We have considered appellant's other contentions but find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dewey v. Dewey, 195 F.2d 779, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 298, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3026 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

195 F.2d 779 (Dewey v. Dewey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Gordon
195 F.2d 779 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)