Dewey Lawrence Cobb v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Dewey Lawrence Cobb v. United States

383 F.2d 789

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 6, 1967

Docket24261

StatusPublished

This text of 383 F.2d 789 (Dewey Lawrence Cobb v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dewey Lawrence Cobb v. United States, 383 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding appellant guilty of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. The sole assignment of error is the claim that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial argument. We hold that the argument was not prejudicial. Moreover, there was no objection to the argument and it did not remotely approach plain error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding appellant guilty of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. The sole assignment of error is the claim that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial argument. We hold that the argument was not prejudicial. Moreover, there was no objection to the argument and it did not remotely approach plain error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 F.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dewey-lawrence-cobb-v-united-states-ca5-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack