Dewey Deel v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Fourth Circuit

Dewey Deel v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

404 F.2d 1383, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4357

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 26, 1968

Docket12746

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 404 F.2d 1383 (Dewey Deel v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dewey Deel v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 404 F.2d 1383, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4357 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The application of Dewey Deel to be granted a period of disability and disability benefits under Sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423, was denied by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. He found that Deel’s proof did not establish disability within the meaning of those sections. Failing in his later suit in the District Court against the Secretary, pursuant to Section 205 (g), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain these privileges and benefits, the claimant appeals. We, too, must decline his request.

The District Judge’s opinion fully states the claim and its environmental circumstances, with specific fact findings and conclusions of law. It demonstrates that substantial evidence was not wanting for the Secretary’s decision. We join in these findings, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion, we now affirm the judgment of the District Court. Deel v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 288 F.Supp. 105 (W.D.Va.1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The application of Dewey Deel to be granted a period of disability and disability benefits under Sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423, was denied by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. He found that Deel’s proof did not establish disability within the meaning of those sections. Failing in his later suit in the District Court against the Secretary, pursuant to Section 205 (g), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain these privileges and benefits, the claimant appeals. We, too, must decline his request.

The District Judge’s opinion fully states the claim and its environmental circumstances, with specific fact findings and conclusions of law. It demonstrates that substantial evidence was not wanting for the Secretary’s decision. We join in these findings, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion, we now affirm the judgment of the District Court. Deel v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 288 F.Supp. 105 (W.D.Va.1968).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 F.2d 1383, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dewey-deel-v-wilbur-j-cohen-secretary-of-health-education-and-welfare-ca4-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack