Dewey Baker v. United States

871 F.2d 1149, 276 U.S. App. D.C. 409, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5347, 1989 WL 37319

• Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
• Decided: April 18, 1989
• Docket: 88-5306
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

871 F.2d 1149

276 U.S.App.D.C. 409

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Dewey BAKER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 88-5306.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 18, 1989.

Before MIKVA, RUTH B. GINSBURG and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's memorandum and order filed August 31, 1988 be affirmed. Appellant's claim that he should be resentenced under the recently enacted federal sentencing guidelines has no arguable basis in law or fact.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.