Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole Commission

907 F.2d 1227, 285 U.S. App. D.C. 221, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12008, 1990 WL 98022

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 916 F.2d 725 →

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 16, 1990·No. 89-5096·Unpublished

Opinion

907 F.2d 1227

285 U.S.App.D.C. 221

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Dewey BAKER, Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 89-5096.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 16, 1990.

Before SILBERMAN, D.H. GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed January 17, 1989 be affirmed for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion issued this day.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

907 F.2d 1227

285 U.S.App.D.C. 221

No. 89-5096.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 16, 1990.

Before SILBERMAN, D.H. GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed January 17, 1989 be affirmed for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion issued this day.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole Commission, 907 F.2d 1227, 285 U.S. App. D.C. 221, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12008, 1990 WL 98022 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Pincite

907 F.2d 1227 (Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.