Dewees v. Miller
This text of 5 Del. 347 (Dewees v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
With regard to wagers being made a subject of judicial investigation and recovery, it has often been regretted that it has been allowed; but it has been allowed, and a recovery may be had in cases where the wager is not against policy or against a statute. In regard to illegal wagers, either party may rescind the contract and recover back the stakes at any time, even after the event, if before the stakes are actually paid over.
But with regard to legal wagers, neither party can disaffirm the contract, or recover back the stakes before or after the event, if the event actually takes place, and a decision has been made as to the result. If the event cannot take place, or the result cannot be ascertained, the depositors may each recover back his money upon general principles governing the action of assumpsit. If the event has taken place and the result determined, the money can be recovered only on the decision as to that result. If, according to the wager, the parties have appointed judges of the event, it can be ascertained only by the decision of the judges.
Verdict for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Del. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dewees-v-miller-delsuperct-1851.