DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Deere & Company, D/B/A John Deere Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Deere & Company, D/B/A John Deere Company

DecidedDecember 14, 2007

Docket06-07-00120-CV

StatusPublished

This text of DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Deere & Company, D/B/A John Deere Company (DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Deere & Company, D/B/A John Deere Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Deere & Company, D/B/A John Deere Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00120-CV

DEWAYNE ROGERS LOGGING, INC., Appellant

V.

DEERE & COMPANY, d/b/a JOHN DEERE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 411th Judicial District Court

Trinity County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18257

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal brought by DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc., from a summary judgment. On our review of the clerk's record, we noted there was a possible defect in our jurisdiction because several parties and issues were not disposed of. On November 2, 2007, we mailed a letter to the appellant requesting that it show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal. In response, on November 12, we received a letter from appellant's counsel stating that the judgment was not final and that a supplemental clerk's record would be filed when the appropriate documents were signed by the trial court finally disposing of all issues and all parties.

We have now been contacted by telephone by appellant's counsel and have again been informed that this is an interlocutory appeal. In that conversation, counsel has requested this Court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Rule 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 13, 2007

Date Decided: December 14, 2007

xt-align: justify">

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #2

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-2464-CCL

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Lacarisha Smith, the sole appellant in this case, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

Date Submitted: August 22, 2006

Date Decided: August 23, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00120-CV

DEWAYNE ROGERS LOGGING, INC., Appellant

V.

DEERE & COMPANY, d/b/a JOHN DEERE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 411th Judicial District Court

Trinity County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18257

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal brought by DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc., from a summary judgment. On our review of the clerk's record, we noted there was a possible defect in our jurisdiction because several parties and issues were not disposed of. On November 2, 2007, we mailed a letter to the appellant requesting that it show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal. In response, on November 12, we received a letter from appellant's counsel stating that the judgment was not final and that a supplemental clerk's record would be filed when the appropriate documents were signed by the trial court finally disposing of all issues and all parties.

We have now been contacted by telephone by appellant's counsel and have again been informed that this is an interlocutory appeal. In that conversation, counsel has requested this Court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Rule 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 13, 2007

Date Decided: December 14, 2007

xt-align: justify">

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #2

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-2464-CCL

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Lacarisha Smith, the sole appellant in this case, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

Date Submitted: August 22, 2006

Date Decided: August 23, 2006

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

DeWayne Rogers Logging, Inc. v. Deere & Company, D/B/A John Deere Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dewayne-rogers-logging-inc-v-deere-company-dba-joh-texapp-2007.