Dewayne Lee Waldrup v. the State of Texas
This text of Dewayne Lee Waldrup v. the State of Texas (Dewayne Lee Waldrup v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00154-CR __________________
DEWAYNE LEE WALDRUP, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20-10-12141-CR __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appointed counsel for appellant, Dewayne Lee Waldrup, filed a motion to
withdraw as counsel and grant Waldrup’s request to proceed pro se on appeal. The
State filed a motion to remand the case for a hearing and admonishments regarding
the dangers and disadvantages of proceeding without appellate counsel. See
generally Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); see also Martinez v. Court of
Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate Dist., 528 U.S. 152, 163 (2000) (Courts may
exercise discretion to allow an appellant to proceed pro se.).
1 We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to
determine whether appointed counsel should be dismissed and whether appellant
should be permitted to proceed pro se. We direct the trial court to fully admonish
appellant as to the dangers of self-representation on appeal and determine whether
appellant’s apparent decision to relinquish the benefits associated with counsel and
to proceed pro se is knowingly and intelligently made. A supplemental reporter’s
record of the hearing, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing any written
findings and orders of the trial court, are to be transmitted to this Court on or before
September 22, 2021. The appeal will be reinstated without further Order of this
Court when the supplemental record is filed. All appellate timetables are suspended
while the case is before the trial court.
ORDER ENTERED August 23, 2021.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dewayne Lee Waldrup v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dewayne-lee-waldrup-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.