Dewayne Johnson v. United States

358 F.2d 139
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1966·No. 22773·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas of unlawful possession of stolen mail in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1708. The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the District Court erred in admitting into evidence certain articles found in an automobile by postal inspectors after the automobile had been lawfully repossessed by appellant’s mortgagee who granted permission to search it without a warrant.

Appellant contends that under the laws of Texas legal title to the automobile was still in his name; therefore, the postal inspectors were required to obtain his permission for a warrantless search. The Government contends that the mortgagee had lawful possession of the vehicle; therefore, permission of the mortgagee rendered the search lawful

The person in lawful possession of an automobile has authority to grant permission to search it. None of appellant’s constitutional liberties were violated in the circumstances. See Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 241, 80 S.Ct. 683, 4 L.Ed.2d 668 (1960); Parr v. United States, 255 F.2d 86 (5 Cir. 1958). The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dewayne Johnson v. United States, 358 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1966).

358 F.2d 139 (Dewayne Johnson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Darrell C. Baldwin
644 F.2d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
State v. Fassler
503 P.2d 807 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1972)
United States v. Judge Mark Ankrom
446 F.2d 1402 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Jerry M. Hughes and David Hoyle
441 F.2d 12 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
State v. Cromeans
472 P.2d 42 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1970)
James Ray Anderson v. United States
399 F.2d 753 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)
State v. Pinkerton
435 P.2d 661 (Washington Supreme Court, 1967)