Devuono v. Muller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Devuono v. Muller

128 Misc. 501, 219 N.Y.S. 83, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 806

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 128 Misc. 501 (Devuono v. Muller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Devuono v. Muller, 128 Misc. 501, 219 N.Y.S. 83, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment as to appellant Candee, Smith & Howland Co., Inc., reversed and complaint dismissed as to it, with thirty dollars costs, on the ground that defendant Muller was an independent contractor engaged by the defendant, appellant, by the day, and at the time of the accident Muller was on his way to the place of business of the corporate defendant, and not doing its work.

All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and O’Malley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment as to appellant Candee, Smith & Howland Co., Inc., reversed and complaint dismissed as to it, with thirty dollars costs, on the ground that defendant Muller was an independent contractor engaged by the defendant, appellant, by the day, and at the time of the accident Muller was on his way to the place of business of the corporate defendant, and not doing its work.

All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and O’Malley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 Misc. 501, 219 N.Y.S. 83, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devuono-v-muller-nyappterm-1926.