Devoy v. Boyer
3 Johns. 247
Opinion
The costs of the attorney for the plaintiff in the two first suits must be paid; he has a lien for them, which ought not to be affected by the set-off. It was so decided in the case of Cole v. Grants,
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Devoy v. Boyer, 3 Johns. 247 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
3 Johns. 247 (Devoy v. Boyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roberts v. Mitchell
29 L.R.A. 705 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1895)
Phillips v. MacKay
23 A. 941 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1892)
Barton v. Hosner
29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Temple & Beaupre v. Scott
3 Minn. 419 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1859)
Banta v. Marcellus
2 Barb. 373 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Dunkin v. Vandenbergh
1 Paige Ch. 622 (New York Court of Chancery, 1829)
Arnoux v. Steinbrenner
1 Paige Ch. 82 (New York Court of Chancery, 1828)
Baker v. Cook
11 Mass. 236 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)