Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.
226 P. 1118, 130 Wash. 707, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1041
Opinions
(dissenting) — Although I joined in the opinion of the Department, and still concur in that opinion as to the joinder [708]*708of parties, I am now convinced that the opinion is erroneous as to the instruction condemned. In my opinion, the instruction condemned follows the statutes of this state, is correct as a matter of law and justice, and should be approved. Ultimately it will be.
The verdict and judgment should therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co., 226 P. 1118, 130 Wash. 707, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1041 (Wash. 1924).
226 P. 1118 (Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coan v. Plaza Equity Elevator Co.
249 N.W. 104 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1933)
McLaughlin v. Shelton Auto Transportation Co.
246 P. 575 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
McCormick v. Index Stages, Inc.
242 P. 1090 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)