Devorah Aikman v. City of Stephenville

Court of Appeals of Texas

Devorah Aikman v. City of Stephenville

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2010·No. 11-10-00229-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion filed October 7, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-10-00229-CV __________

DEVORAH AIKMAN, Appellant V. CITY OF STEPHENVILLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the Justice Court, Precinct 1 Erath County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07162010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Devorah Aikman filed a pro se appeal challenging the justice court’s order to sell or dispose of two stud horses that had been cruelly treated. We dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Upon receiving the notice of appeal, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that it appeared that this court had no jurisdiction in this matter; directing Aikman to respond by September 16, 2010, and show grounds for continuing her appeal; and informing Aikman that appropriate action could be taken pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42 absent a timely response. Aikman has not responded to our September 1, 2010 letter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

October 7, 2010 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion filed October 7, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-10-00229-CV __________

DEVORAH AIKMAN, Appellant V. CITY OF STEPHENVILLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the Justice Court, Precinct 1 Erath County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07162010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Devorah Aikman filed a pro se appeal challenging the justice court’s order to sell or dispose of two stud horses that had been cruelly treated. We dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Upon receiving the notice of appeal, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that it appeared that this court had no jurisdiction in this matter; directing Aikman to respond by September 16, 2010, and show grounds for continuing her appeal; and informing Aikman that appropriate action could be taken pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42 absent a timely response. Aikman has not responded to our September 1, 2010 letter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

October 7, 2010 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Devorah Aikman v. City of Stephenville, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Devorah Aikman v. City of Stephenville (Devorah Aikman v. City of Stephenville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.