Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley

198 Ill. App. 549

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 12, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,191

StatusPublished

This text of 198 Ill. App. 549 (Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley, 198 Ill. App. 549 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that owner of building assumed responsibility for payment for goods. In an action to recover for paints, etc., delivered at and used in decorating defendant’s building, where the evidence was conflicting as to whether defendant assumed responsibility for the bill, a finding for plaintiff held supported by the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that owner of building assumed responsibility for payment for goods. In an action to recover for paints, etc., delivered at and used in decorating defendant’s building, where the evidence was conflicting as to whether defendant assumed responsibility for the bill, a finding for plaintiff held supported by the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Ill. App. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devoe-raynolds-co-v-omalley-illappct-1916.