Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley

198 Ill. App. 549

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 12, 1916·No. Gen. No. 21,191·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that owner of building assumed responsibility for payment for goods. In an action to recover for paints, etc., delivered at and used in decorating defendant’s building, where the evidence was conflicting as to whether defendant assumed responsibility for the bill, a finding for plaintiff held supported by the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that owner of building assumed responsibility for payment for goods. In an action to recover for paints, etc., delivered at and used in decorating defendant’s building, where the evidence was conflicting as to whether defendant assumed responsibility for the bill, a finding for plaintiff held supported by the evidence.

Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley, 198 Ill. App. 549 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

198 Ill. App. 549 (Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. O'Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.