Devlin v. James McMillan & Co.
This text of 79 N.W. 1126 (Devlin v. James McMillan & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This question involves no question of law not decided in the case of Armour Packing Co. v. Brown, 76 Minn. 465. Counsel for appellant claim that the facts in the two cases are dissimilar, in that in the former case the assignment was made by a corporation,, by its president and secretary, pursuant to a resolution of its board of directors authorizing them to make only an assignment under our insolvency laws for the benefit of its creditors, while in the latter case the assignment was by an individual. This does not distinguish the cases, for in each the only assignment made was one pursuant to the insolvency law for the benefit of creditors releasing their claims. This case is therefore ruled by that of Armour Packing Co. v. Brown.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.W. 1126, 77 Minn. 137, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devlin-v-james-mcmillan-co-minn-1899.