Devlin v. Devlin

212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Devlin v. Devlin. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 A.D.2d 1130

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of defendant for an award of counsel fees and expenses incurred in the prosecution of her appeal in the underlying matrimonial action (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a], [d]; Scheinkman, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 14, Domestic Relations Law C237:6, at 516; see also, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; Borakove v Borakove, 116 AD2d 683). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Counsel Fees.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Devlin v. Devlin, 212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 1060 (Devlin v. Devlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Borakove v. Borakove
116 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)