Devitt v. Ulster County Board of Realtors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Devitt v. Ulster County Board of Realtors

32 A.D.2d 993, 302 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3494

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 993 (Devitt v. Ulster County Board of Realtors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Devitt v. Ulster County Board of Realtors, 32 A.D.2d 993, 302 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, without a jury, dismissing appellant’s application, in a proceeding brought under CPLR article 78, to compel respondent to accept him into its membership as an active member. There are some 200 licensed real estate brokers in Ulster County, of which 54, or 27%, are members of respondent. Appellant, a licensed real estate broker, argues that because of certain definite advantages in membership, he is unable to make a living on an equal competitive basis with members of the respondent and, therefore, respondent should be compelled to admit him. It is well settled that the courts of this State will interfere in these matters only when there is a showing of “ economic necessity ” for membership and that the membership corporation is a party to a monopoly (Matter of Salter v. New York State Psychological Assn., 14 N Y 2d 100, 106-107; Matter of Kurk v. Medical Soc. of County of Queens, 24 A D 2d 897, affd. 18 N Y 2d 928). To establish “ economic necessity ”, a petitioner must demonstrate that he cannot successfully continue in his profession without membership in the corporation or association (cf. Matter of Salter v. New York State Psychological Assn., supra, p. 107). It is not enough, as petitioner contends, to show he is unable to “ make a living on an equal competitive basis with members of the respondent.” On the instant record, the trial court could properly find that appellant is successfully engaged in the real estate field in Ulster County and thus that he has not fulfilled his burden of establishing economic necessity. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.; Aulisi, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, without a jury, dismissing appellant’s application, in a proceeding brought under CPLR article 78, to compel respondent to accept him into its membership as an active member. There are some 200 licensed real estate brokers in Ulster County, of which 54, or 27%, are members of respondent. Appellant, a licensed real estate broker, argues that because of certain definite advantages in membership, he is unable to make a living on an equal competitive basis with members of the respondent and, therefore, respondent should be compelled to admit him. It is well settled that the courts of this State will interfere in these matters only when there is a showing of “ economic necessity ” for membership and that the membership corporation is a party to a monopoly (Matter of Salter v. New York State Psychological Assn., 14 N Y 2d 100, 106-107; Matter of Kurk v. Medical Soc. of County of Queens, 24 A D 2d 897, affd. 18 N Y 2d 928). To establish “ economic necessity ”, a petitioner must demonstrate that he cannot successfully continue in his profession without membership in the corporation or association (cf. Matter of Salter v. New York State Psychological Assn., supra, p. 107). It is not enough, as petitioner contends, to show he is unable to “ make a living on an equal competitive basis with members of the respondent.” On the instant record, the trial court could properly find that appellant is successfully engaged in the real estate field in Ulster County and thus that he has not fulfilled his burden of establishing economic necessity. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.; Aulisi, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 993, 302 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devitt-v-ulster-county-board-of-realtors-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack