DeVino v. Hollander

259 A.D. 1042, 22 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7900

This text of 259 A.D. 1042 (DeVino v. Hollander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeVino v. Hollander, 259 A.D. 1042, 22 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the dismissal of this case under rule 2, subdivision (d), of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County, and to restore the case to the calendar, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 1042, 22 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devino-v-hollander-nyappdiv-1940.