Devine v. Wold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Devine v. Wold

153 Ill. App. 74, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 916

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided February 15, 1910·No. Gen. No. 15,044·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff below, Zimmerman, recovered a judgment against defendant for $500. A motion to strike the bill of exceptions was allowed herein on March 26, 1909. No errors have been argued nor have any been assigned upon the common law record. Consequently, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff below, Zimmerman, recovered a judgment against defendant for $500. A motion to strike the bill of exceptions was allowed herein on March 26, 1909. No errors have been argued nor have any been assigned upon the common law record. Consequently, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Devine v. Wold, 153 Ill. App. 74, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 916 (Ill. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

153 Ill. App. 74 (Devine v. Wold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.