Devine v. Wold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Devine v. Wold

153 Ill. App. 74, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 916

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 15, 1910

DocketGen. No. 15,044

StatusPublished

This text of 153 Ill. App. 74 (Devine v. Wold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Devine v. Wold, 153 Ill. App. 74, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 916 (Ill. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff below, Zimmerman, recovered a judgment against defendant for $500. A motion to strike the bill of exceptions was allowed herein on March 26, 1909. No errors have been argued nor have any been assigned upon the common law record. Consequently, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff below, Zimmerman, recovered a judgment against defendant for $500. A motion to strike the bill of exceptions was allowed herein on March 26, 1909. No errors have been argued nor have any been assigned upon the common law record. Consequently, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 Ill. App. 74, 1910 Ill. App. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devine-v-wold-illappct-1910.