Devine v. Sanford
107 F.2d 26, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2669
This text of 107 F.2d 26 (Devine v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Devine v. Sanford, 107 F.2d 26, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2669 (5th Cir. 1939).
Opinion
In the trial before the District Judge the testimony of the applicant for the writ of habeas corpus was contradicted throughout by witnesses for the respondent. In believing the latter, the District Judge committed no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
107 F.2d 26, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devine-v-sanford-ca5-1939.