Devine v. Pfau

17 F.2d 1008, 57 App. D.C. 402, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3094
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1927
DocketNo. 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F.2d 1008 (Devine v. Pfau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Devine v. Pfau, 17 F.2d 1008, 57 App. D.C. 402, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3094 (D.C. Cir. 1927).

Opinion

ROBB, J.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the tribunals of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, in which priority was awarded Pfau, who was first to conceive and first to reduce to practice. For the reasons fully stated’ by the Patent Office, we affirm the decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F.2d 1008, 57 App. D.C. 402, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devine-v-pfau-cadc-1927.