Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Devine v. Hammer

Devine v. Hammer

221 A.D. 50, 222 N.Y.S. 290, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 A.D. 50 (Devine v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Devine v. Hammer, 221 A.D. 50, 222 N.Y.S. 290, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

A complaint in an action for false arrest must allege that the arrest was illegal or made without a warrant. The plaintiff having failed to allege such facts, the complaint was properly dismissed.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Proskauer, JJ.; O’Malley and Proskauer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bienenfeld v. Mortgage Commission
161 Misc. 311 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D. 50, 222 N.Y.S. 290, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devine-v-hammer-nyappdiv-1927.