Devincentis v. Devincentis
667 A.2d 570, 39 Conn. App. 931, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 490
This text of 667 A.2d 570 (Devincentis v. Devincentis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Devincentis v. Devincentis, 667 A.2d 570, 39 Conn. App. 931, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 490 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dissolution. This appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss the defendant’s claim would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lord v. Lord
689 A.2d 509 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
667 A.2d 570, 39 Conn. App. 931, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devincentis-v-devincentis-connappct-1995.