Devincentis v. Devincentis

667 A.2d 570, 39 Conn. App. 931, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 490
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 5, 1995·No. 13609·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dissolution. This appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss the defendant’s claim would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Devincentis v. Devincentis, 667 A.2d 570, 39 Conn. App. 931, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 490 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

667 A.2d 570 (Devincentis v. Devincentis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lord v. Lord
689 A.2d 509 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1997)