Devincent Batalona v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 24, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-02309·Unknown

Opinion

Cyrus Safa Attorney at Law: 13241 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Columbine Devincent Batalona COLUMBINE DEVINCENT ) Case No.: 2:18-cv-02309-VCF BATALONA, ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR Plaintiff, ) THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ) ATTORNEY FEES AND vs. ) EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE ) EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ANDREW SAUL, ) ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND Commissioner of Social Security, ) COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § ) 1920 Defendant. ) ) THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Columbine Devincent Batalona be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Columbine Devincent Batalona, the government will consider the matter of Columbine Devincent Batalona's assignment of EAJA fees to Cyrus Safa. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Columbine Devincent Batalona, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Columbine Devincent Batalona does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Columbine Devincent Batalona.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Cyrus Safa. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Columbine Devincent Batalona's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to,

any and all claims that Columbine Devincent Batalona and/or Cyrus Safa including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury ] This award is without prejudice to the rights of Cyrus Safa and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. DATE: April 20, 2020 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Cyprus Safa BY: Cyrus Safa Attorney for plaintiff Columbine Devincent Batalona DATED: April 21, 2020 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH 1] United States Attorney /s/ Wichack &. Marriott

Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) DATE: ; Ga < THE HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Devincent Batalona v. Berryhill, (D. Nev. 2020).

Devincent Batalona v. Berryhill (Devincent Batalona v. Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)