Devin Pendleton v. Jean Finley

509 F. App'x 568
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 2013
Docket12-3375
StatusUnpublished

This text of 509 F. App'x 568 (Devin Pendleton v. Jean Finley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Devin Pendleton v. Jean Finley, 509 F. App'x 568 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Devin Alex Phillip Pendleton appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following a bench trial. 2 Pendleton offers no valid basis for reversal, and we find none. See Fowler v. LAC Minerals (USA), LLC, 694 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir.2012) (reviewing for clear error fact finding and reviewing de novo legal conclusions and mixed questions of law and fact); Richardson v. Sugg, 448 F.3d 1046, 1052 (8th Cir.2006) (due regard must be afforded to trial court’s judgment of witness credibility). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

2

. Appellee correctly notes that Pendleton did not order a trial transcript, but a recording of the bench trial was available for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. Sugg
448 F.3d 1046 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
Robert G. Fowler v. LAC Minerals (USA), LLC
694 F.3d 930 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
509 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devin-pendleton-v-jean-finley-ca8-2013.