Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard
This text of Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard (Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-3152 ___________________________
Deverick Scott
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC; Marshall Reed, Assistant Director, ADC; Gibson, Warden, VSM Unit, ADC; Shipman, Assistant Warden, VSM Unit, ADC; Plummer, Captain, VSM Unit, ADC; Carroll, Major, VSM Unit, ADC; Lord, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC; Jones, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC; Washington, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
Jonathan Vineyard, Corporal, VSM Unit, ADC (originally Vineyard)
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
Whittaker, Corporal, VSM Unit, ADC; Brown, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC; Garcia, Sergeant, VSM Unit, ADC; King, Sergeant, VSM Unit, ADC; Gloria Thompson, Grievance Officer, VSM Unit, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________
Submitted: July 27, 2023 Filed: August 1, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Jonathan Vineyard, an Arkansas correctional officer, appeals the decision denying summary judgment on Deverick Scott’s First Amendment retaliation claim. Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments that we can consider in this interlocutory appeal, see Heartland Acad. Cmty. Church v. Waddle, 595 F.3d 798, 804, 807 (8th Cir. 2010) (explaining that our review is de novo, but we cannot consider sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenges), we agree with the district court1 that genuine issues of material fact exist, see Garcia v. City of Trenton, 348 F.3d 726, 729 (8th Cir. 2003) (looking to whether a person of “ordinary firmness” would have been chilled); Irving v. Dormire, 519 F.3d 441, 451 (8th Cir. 2008) (recognizing that causing a prisoner to be seen as a “snitch” puts him “in danger of being assaulted or killed by other inmates”). We accordingly affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable D. Price Marshall, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, partially adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deverick-scott-v-jonathan-vineyard-ca8-2023.