Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2023
Docket22-3152
StatusUnpublished

This text of Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard (Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard, (8th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-3152 ___________________________

Deverick Scott

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Dexter Payne, Director, ADC; Marshall Reed, Assistant Director, ADC; Gibson, Warden, VSM Unit, ADC; Shipman, Assistant Warden, VSM Unit, ADC; Plummer, Captain, VSM Unit, ADC; Carroll, Major, VSM Unit, ADC; Lord, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC; Jones, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC; Washington, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Jonathan Vineyard, Corporal, VSM Unit, ADC (originally Vineyard)

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

Whittaker, Corporal, VSM Unit, ADC; Brown, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, ADC; Garcia, Sergeant, VSM Unit, ADC; King, Sergeant, VSM Unit, ADC; Gloria Thompson, Grievance Officer, VSM Unit, ADC

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: July 27, 2023 Filed: August 1, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Vineyard, an Arkansas correctional officer, appeals the decision denying summary judgment on Deverick Scott’s First Amendment retaliation claim. Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments that we can consider in this interlocutory appeal, see Heartland Acad. Cmty. Church v. Waddle, 595 F.3d 798, 804, 807 (8th Cir. 2010) (explaining that our review is de novo, but we cannot consider sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenges), we agree with the district court1 that genuine issues of material fact exist, see Garcia v. City of Trenton, 348 F.3d 726, 729 (8th Cir. 2003) (looking to whether a person of “ordinary firmness” would have been chilled); Irving v. Dormire, 519 F.3d 441, 451 (8th Cir. 2008) (recognizing that causing a prisoner to be seen as a “snitch” puts him “in danger of being assaulted or killed by other inmates”). We accordingly affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable D. Price Marshall, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, partially adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. City Of Trenton
348 F.3d 726 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
Irving v. Dormire
519 F.3d 441 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Heartland Academy Community Church v. Waddle
595 F.3d 798 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Deverick Scott v. Jonathan Vineyard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deverick-scott-v-jonathan-vineyard-ca8-2023.