Devereux v. Cox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Devereux v. Cox

241 A.D. 818

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There is a variance between what the title company was willing to insure and what the contract required. The survey did not ind cate a possibility of boundary dispute between the owner of the premises and the owner of premises adjoining to the north. This possibility was indicated by the title company as an exception. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There is a variance between what the title company was willing to insure and what the contract required. The survey did not ind cate a possibility of boundary dispute between the owner of the premises and the owner of premises adjoining to the north. This possibility was indicated by the title company as an exception. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Devereux v. Cox, 241 A.D. 818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 818 (Devereux v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.