Deveraux v. Meadowlark of Billings LLC
This text of Deveraux v. Meadowlark of Billings LLC (Deveraux v. Meadowlark of Billings LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
GARY & CHERIE DEVERAUX, STEVE & JUDY WOODARD, CV 22-136-BLG-SPW CHRISTINE BLAYLOCK, KYLE LANGE, JOHN & JOYCE MCDONALD, and TIM & CHRISTI ORDER REISENAUER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
VS. MEADLOWLARK OF BILLINGS LLC, and HAVENPARK MANAGEMENT LLC,
Defendants.
Before the Court is Defendants Meadowlark of Billings LLC and Havenpark Management LLC’s Motion to Dissolve State Court Order. (Doc. 8). Defendants
urge the Court to dissolve the state court’s order granting a temporary restraining order! because Plaintiffs did not give Defendants notice of the application for injunctive relief or provide the state court with reasons that notice should not be
! As both parties note, whether the state court order is one for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction is, on its face, unclear. Despite the order’s reference to a preliminary injunction, the fact that it was issued without notice—which is not allowed for a preliminary injunction under state law, Mont. Code Ann. § 27-19-301(1)—and it was to expire within seven days of its issuance, the Court presumes it is a temporary restraining order.
required, in violation of Montana law. (Doc. 9 at 4-5). Plaintiffs respond that the
issue is moot because the restraining order expired December 16, 2022, pursuant to
Montana Code Annotated § 27-19-316. When a temporary restraining order is issued by a state court and then the
case is removed to federal court, the relief remains in effect for 14 days from the
date of removal. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters and Auto
Truck Drivers Local No. 70 of Alameda Cty., 415 U.S. 423, 437 (1974) (citing Fed.
R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2)). Here, the state court granted a
temporary restraining order on December 6, 2022. (Doc. 1-7). Defendants removed the case to this Court on December 7, 2022. (Doc. 1). As such, the order for the temporary restraining order was in effect until December 21, 2022. Since Plaintiffs did not seek an extension of the order, there is no order for the Court to
dissolve and the issue is moot. IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants Meadowlark of Billings LLC and Havenpark Management LLC’s Motion to Dissolve State Court Order (Doc. 8) is
DENIED as moot.
DATED this th Gay of January, 2023. Lava Cabo SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Deveraux v. Meadowlark of Billings LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deveraux-v-meadowlark-of-billings-llc-mtd-2023.