Devens v. M. A. Henry Co.
This text of 8 F.R.D. 368 (Devens v. M. A. Henry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant Woonsocket Falls Mill is a Rhode Island corporation, and not licensed to do business in New York. The motion to dismiss as to that defendant for improper venue is therefore granted. Moss v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 701; Suttle v. Reich Bros. Const. Co., 333 U.S. 163, 68 S.Ct. 587. The motion of the defendant M. A. Henry Co., Inc., to implead Woonsocket Falls Mill as a third-party defendant under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 14, 28 U.S.C.A., is also granted; the defendant M. A. Henry Co., Inc., is a New York corporation, and the jurisdictional and venue requirements to support the motion are unquestioned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F.R.D. 368, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devens-v-m-a-henry-co-nysd-1948.