DeVaughn v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

DeVaughn v. Johnson

90 F. App'x 36

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2004·No. No. 03-7943·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael O. DeVaughn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find that DeVaughn failed to establish ground for relief under the Rule. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). Thus, we do not find that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion. United States v. Holland, 214 F.3d 523, 527 (4th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael O. DeVaughn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find that DeVaughn failed to establish ground for relief under the Rule. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). Thus, we do not find that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion. United States v. Holland, 214 F.3d 523, 527 (4th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

DeVaughn v. Johnson, 90 F. App'x 36 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 36 (DeVaughn v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related