DeVaughn v. Johnson
This text of DeVaughn v. Johnson (DeVaughn v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7943
MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN, a/k/a Michael DeVaughn,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ISAAC JOHNSON, JR., Assistant United States Attorney; J. WESLEY HOLBROOK, Assistant United States Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-01-2657-4-24)
Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 18, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael O. DeVaughn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael O. DeVaughn appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b). We have reviewed the record and find that DeVaughn failed
to establish ground for relief under the Rule. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b). Thus, we do not find that the district court abused its
discretion in denying the motion. United States v. Holland, 214
F.3d 523, 527 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DeVaughn v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devaughn-v-johnson-ca4-2004.