DeVanzo v. Newark Insurance

337 N.E.2d 131, 37 N.Y.2d 733, 374 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2102
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 26, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 337 N.E.2d 131 (DeVanzo v. Newark Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeVanzo v. Newark Insurance, 337 N.E.2d 131, 37 N.Y.2d 733, 374 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2102 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice James D. Hopkins at the Appellate Division. Question certified answered in the affirmative. Of course, upon a trial and if within the pleadings, defendant insurer is free to establish, if it can, that the policy was not cancelable by it under section 167-a of the Insurance Law. The present record provides no basis to establish this contention made for the first time in the reply brief submitted by the insurer. In so noting, the court is not in a position to consider the effect, if any, of such cancelability.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Emisphere Technologies, Inc.
408 F. Supp. 2d 668 (S.D. Indiana, 2006)
US Trust Co. of New York v. Alpert
10 F. Supp. 2d 290 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Cruden v. Bank of New York
957 F.2d 961 (Second Circuit, 1992)
Libra Bank Ltd. v. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica, S.A.
570 F. Supp. 870 (S.D. New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 N.E.2d 131, 37 N.Y.2d 733, 374 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devanzo-v-newark-insurance-ny-1975.